Home | About Me | Links to My Articles | Info on My Books | Contact Me
Welcome to MahdiWatch.org!
NEWSFLASH! COMMENTS LINK
BELOW EACH POST IS ENABLED! FEEL FREE TO BURY ME, PRAISE ME--OR JUST ISSUE A PERSONAL FATWA!
al-Mahdi is "the rightly-guided one" who, according to Islamic Hadiths (traditions),
will come before the end of time to make the entire world Muslim. Over the last 1400 years numerous claimants to the
mantle of the Mahdi have arisen in both Shi`i and Sunni circles. Modern belief in the coming of the Mahdi has
manifested most famously in the 1979 al-`Utaybi uprising of Sa`udi Arabia, and more recently in the ongoing
Mahdist movements (some violent) in Iraq, as well as in the frequently-expressed public prayers of former Iranian
President Ahmadinezhad bidding the Mahdi to return and, in the larger Sunni Islamic world, by claims that Usamah bin Ladin
might be the (occulted) Mahdi. Now in 2014 Mahdism is active in Syria, as the jihadist opposition group Jabhat al-Nusra
claims to be fighting to prepare the way for his coming; and in the new "Islamic State/caliphate" spanning
Syrian and Iraqi territory, as its leadership promotes the upcoming apocalyptic battle with the West at Dabiq, Syria. This site will track such Mahdi-related movements, aspirations, propaganda and beliefs in both Sunni and Shi`i
milieus, as well as other Muslim eschatological yearnings.
For a primer
on Mahdism, see my 2005 article, "What's Worse than Violent Jihadists?," at the History News Network: http://hnn.us/articles/13146.html; for more in-depth info, see the links here to my other writings, including my book on Mahdism.
Friday, June 29, 2007
The Blind Leading the Blind
11:06 pm edt
When I was in high school and college, one of my heroes was Archbishop Desmond Tutu, both for his Christian faith and his
opposition rooted therein to the apartheid regime in South Africa. But while the good archbishop is no doubt still as
innocent as a dove, he seems to have forgotten the other part of Christ's admonition about being as shrewd as a snake.
How else to explain some of his frankly fatuous comments this past week:
"'Muslim terrorism' - have
you ever read anywhere 'Christian terrorism'? - as if Islam propagates violence, but you have never spoken about what
happened in Northern Ireland as Christian terrorism," he said.
"Fundamentally there is no faith that I know
that propagates violence, that says it's a good thing to oppress anybody" (complete story is at Worldwide Religion
These statements, delivered to journalists in London this past week, are so incredibly ignorant as to defy belief.
First, I'm not sure it's true that the media "never" described the violence in Northern Ireland as having
a basis in Christianity. But whether it was painted thus or not, the fact remains that Protestant and Catholic violence absolutely
cannot be justified from the New Testament and, in fact, to do violence in the name of Christ is to expressly violate His
teachings. However, to do violence in the name of Islam and Muhammad is really not that hard a task. One simply can
turn to Sura Muhammad:3ff and Sura al-Anfal:12ff to find that the beheading of unbelievers is sanctioned; Sura al-Nisa':34ff
to see that a man is allowed to beat his wives; Sura al-Ma'ida:33 to read that those who fight against Islam are
to be killed, crucified or have their hands and feet amputated on alternate sides. The founder of Islam himself led
armies in battle and ordered the execution of hundreds of Jewish Arabs in Medina. And then there's
this little matter of jihad that has been waged on and off (mostly the former) by Muslims and Muslim states over the last
1,400 years, most notably (but by no means only) by Islamic leaders who have declared themselves mahdis. As I've
said many times in other writings, past and modern violence perpetrated by Muslims is justified from the Qur'an,
the Hadiths (traditions allegedly going back to Muhammad) and the precedents of Islamic history.
Archbishop Tutu says "there is no faith that I know that propagates violence," he's simply proving that he knows
nothing about Islam. In which case he should stop making public pronouncements about it.
By the way,
the title to this post refers to Desmond Tutu, who should know better, purporting to instruct those who certainly don't:
Friday, June 22, 2007
The enemy of my friend is...my friend?
9:28 am edt
months ago on this blog I predicted that recent fulminations by al-Qadhafi and Khamaenei regarding Pan-Islamic unity
portended increasing cooperation between Libya and Iran--and thus yet another strategic Islamic headache for the U.S. (April
27, 2007: "Reunited and It Feels So Good--Libyan and Iranan PLans for a 'New Empire of the Mahdi'). Things
are moving even faster than I anticipated, according to this story from the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting yesterday
(June 21, 2007):
"IRI, Libya close on regional issues
Vice President Parviz Davoudi said on Wednesday that the Islamic Republic of Iran and Libya have common and close view points
on regional and international issues....prior to seeing off ceremony for Libyan Prime Minister Al-Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi, he
said that Tehran and Tripoli could adopt closer stand [sic] in dealing with regional developments....
said the two sides also reviewed latest developments in Iraq and
called for forging unity between Muslims and avoiding factional disputes between the Shia and Sunni Muslims....he said the
two sides are determined to broaden all-out ties [emphasis added]. IRI and Libya could have constructive cooperation
in Latin America and African continent [sic]relying on their capabilities and potentialities, Davoudi said....IRI and Libya
are scheduled to sign agreements on expansion of bilateral cooperation."
Complete link: http://www.iribnews.ir/Full_en.asp?news_id=239272&n=33
1) Again, contrary
to the conventional wisdom that Sunnis like the Libyans and Shi`is like the Iranians cannot ever get along, this represents
an ecumenical, Pan-Islamic movement that could be either a danger or an opportunity for the Islamic world and the West:
the danger is that Iran could expand its role as self-styled leader of the ummah and, beyond that, the possibility
of operational and even political unity under a Mahdi that at least some Sunnis and and Shi`is could both acknowledge; the
opportunity (less likely, but extant) is that the concept of ijtihad, "independent judgment," in
Islamic law could backwash from Iran into Libya and thus into Sunni world--perhaps making a dent in the rigid Manichaean world-view
of the Salafists/Wahhabis.
2) al-Qadahfi's coming clean on WMD programs a few years ago--motivated by his fear that
the 82nd Airborne might soon be dropping into his tent--obviously has not eliminated his long-held desire to foster both Pan-Islamic
and Pan-African unity. Again, this could be a blessing or a curse from our diplomatic point of view, depending on whether
the State Department is smart enough to exploit, if you will, our new North African "friend."
3) That no-doubt
pointed reference to Latin America is intended to remind the U.S. that El Jefe Hugo Chavez and the Mahdi's wanna-be front
man, Mahmud Ahmadinezhad, are twin sons of different mothers and that the possibility exists for a Tehran-Caracas-Tripoli
alliance that could operate on at least three continents (Asia, Africa, Latin America).
Monday, June 18, 2007
A New Indian Mahdi?
3:11 pm edt
A new Mahdi claimant has arisen in India, one "Mohammad Shakil" al-Mahdi:
arrested for instigating Muslim youths"
("UNI," June 16, 2007)
Raisen, India - Twelve
people who were arrested yesterday for tutoring Muslim youths to wage a holy war, are followers of the controversial Mehdi
sect, which believes that the 'prophet' would come to this world again when injustice increases.
the arrested, Mohammed Shakil, claimed that he was Mehdi and would become omnipotent in a few years."
story goes on to say that while small (slightly over 100 followers), the group had members throughout India. Furthermore,
after taking a "pledge" to the new Mahdi, they would be taken to meet Usama bin Ladin!
In my book Holiest
Wars two of the eight Mahdist movements treated therein were Indian: those of Muhammad Jawnpuri in the late 15th/early
16th c. CE, and of Ahmad Barelwi in the 19th c. These new Mahdists are likely in the same tradition, although more research
needs be done. The four most striking elements of this story are:
1) it's the second openly-declared Mahdist
claim of 2007, the first being that of the Najaf Mahdi of southern Iraq in January
2) it proves that Mahdism is NOT limited
to the Middle East proper, and so confounds the conventional wisdom that radical Islamic movements are almost certainly to
occur only in the Salafi/Wahhabi Arab Middle East
3) it shows that even when Usama bin Ladin himself is not declared
or considered the Mahdi (as has been done), even a self-styled Mahdi and his followers acknowledge UBL's importance!
4) reporters [and analysts] continue to manifest a colossal ignorance of Mahdism: for example, this articles says
that only a "section of Islam" believes in the Mahdi (untrue; the vast majority, both Sunni AND Shi`i, do), and
it refers to the Mahdi as a "prophet" (again, untrue).
Here's the link: http://wwrn.org/article.php?idd=25398
Saturday, June 16, 2007
Leaving Facts Behind: Tribulation Force on Glenn Beck
3:48 pm edt
Last night (Friday, June 15, 2007) Glenn Beck had on his TV show three prominent fiction authors who deal with eschatology:
Joel Rosenberg (Epicenter), Jerry Jenkins and Tim LaHaye (the Left Behind series). While
I appreciate the fact that someone in the mainstream media (Beck is on CNN Headline News) is at least talking about eschatological
motivations affecting modern events, it's very disappointing that he featured three self-styled "experts" on
CHRISTIAN eschatology and did not bother to bring on someone well-versed in ISLAMIC eschatology--which would have made sense,
considering that the bulk of the discussion centered around the Middle East and in particular the end of time obsessions manifested
by President Ahmadinezhad of Iran. If anyone knows Glenn Beck, suggest he read my book on the topic of Mahdism.
The most egregious oversight was the ignorance of the fact that belief in the coming of the Mahdi is strong in BOTH Sunni
and Shi`i Islam, not just in the latter--as these "experts" seemed to think.
Saturday, June 9, 2007
Preparing the Way for the Mahdi?
8:43 am edt
Recently I wrote about the convergence of interests within the Islamic world, possibly overriding the Sunni-Shi`i split, evidenced
by statements from al-Qadhafi of Libya and Khamanei of Iran. Further evidence for this trend comes from Iraq, where
Shi`i leader Muqtada al-Sadr has now cast himself as an ecumenical Muslim, as well as from Lebanon:
Rising: Sect leaders craft message for masses"
by Scott Peterson ("Christian Science Monitor," June 7,
Baghdad, Iraq - Emerging for the first time after months in hiding from US forces and Shiite rivals, Moqtada
al-Sadr swept into Iraq's Kufa mosque in late May to deliver a potent sermon.
"No, no, no to Satan! No, no,
no to America! No, no, no to occupation! No, no, no to
Israel!" he roared, wearing a white shroud over black robes
to indicate his readiness for martyrdom.
But along with strident calls to resist, the cleric struck another theme that
is increasingly heard from ascendant Shiite leaders: Muslim unity.
"I want to say now that the blood of Sunnis
is forbidden to everyone," preached the cleric. "They are our brothers in religion and in nationality."
The message is a pan-Islamic blend of Shiite ideology and nationalism heard also in Lebanon from Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah
Iran from President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Those populist leaders, at the fore of new Shiite prominence in
the Middle East, are defining an "axis of resistance" to America and its allies in rhetoric and action. That stance
is winning some support across the sectarian divide, while their extensive social programs inspire support from the region's
Besides the usual geopolitical aspects to this, it's worth noting that many modern supporters
of Mahdism, both Sunni and Shi`i, envision that when the Mahdi comes true Muslims of both persuasion will cast aside their
differences and follow him as he creates a global caliphate. Furthermore, the Mahdi will also function as something
of a global "Robin Hood," redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor--a function which Hizbullah and the Islamic
Republic of Iran are already engaging in.
Here's the complete link: http://wwrn.org/article.php?idd=25306
7:49 am edt
I have repeatedly argued that Usamah bin Ladin is likely in Iran, rather than in Afghanistan or the Afghan-Pakistani border
region, contrary to the conventional wisdom among government officials and analysts. Circumstantial evidence supporting
my thesis has come recently from Bin Ladin's former bodyguard, Nasser al-Bahri, in a recent interview with al-Arabiya
Interviewer: "Do you think there is any coordination between the [Al-Qaeda] organization
Nasser Al-Bahri: "There is coordination on the basis of joint
Interviewer: "In what way?"
"For example, there is a common enemy - the U.S. - and the Iranians, for your information, know that the [American] strike
in inevitable. Therefore, they have to take advantage of all those available on the scene, including the Al-Qaeda organization."
Interviewer: "So the way you see it, the Al-Qaeda organization can cooperate with the Iranians
Nasser Al-Bahri: "It can cooperate with the Iranians
but it won't operate under the Iranians. But there is no problem with regard to cooperation."
full link: http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD161107
|Jamkaran Mosque near Qom, Iran (during my trip there Aug. 2008)